To an outsider, like myself, living in the United States,
this resembles socialism, or at the very least some sort of wealth distribution
system. I am also very skeptical of a government agency’s ability to run
anything efficiently (just think of your most recent visit to a local DMV).
However, I do see problems with the US system, and Ms. Partanen does a great
job pointing them out. I agree that sky rocketing health care costs and the
absence of any kind of social net for young parents or the elderly who need end
of life care make the United States look like the Wild West compared to the
structured and generous social policies of some other developed nations such as
Finland. So I read this book in the hopes of glimpsing some way that the US
could move forward in both preserving the healthy competition of the market
place while also making life for its citizens a little better protected by
creating a reliable social net that could help them bounce back after
childbirth, or a serious illness, help them get old gracefully, and ensure that
youth has adequate access to education.
Unfortunately, this little book, as one would guess, does
not provide solutions to these complex issues that scholars, politicians and
social policy experts have been debating for decades. What Partanen does well
in her book is describing the social protection benefits available to all in
Finland and pointing out where the US falls short in corresponding areas. It is
by no means an in-depth analysis of both systems. You will also not find any
recommendations for how the US could, for instance, provide maternity leave to
all. Partanen simply states that other developed countries do it, why can’t the
US. What she does not go into is what practical steps the US could take towards
implementing such a huge in scope social protection policy change. Finland is a
lot different from the US in terms of population size, economy, geo-politics,
etc. So what works in Finland might not be necessarily transferrable to the US.
She cites sweeping policy changes that were implemented in Finland shortly
after World War II. Such drastic revamping would not be easy in this country.
To sum up, it was good to get an overview of the advantages
that citizens of Scandinavian countries enjoy. But I did feel that the author
was bashing the US too harshly. I was also getting tired of seeing the author overuse
the phrase “the Nordic theory of love.” I think we all would like to live in a
better world free of disease and hunger, and it is always healthy for any
country to aspire to a better quality of life for its citizens. Partanen’s book
does just that – paints an image of what the US could aspire to or set up as a
goal. She does not however have any suggestions to how to get there. And that
is the crux of the issue. 4 out of 5 stars.